Peer Review Misconduct
The Journal of Innovation Management (JIM) is committed to its strict double-blind peer review policy and adheres to COPE's Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers.
The Peer Review process is a very important step in any academic journal, and critical for its success and prestige. JIM is no exception, and to this end, building on the competence of each associate editor as well as on the competence of each member of the editorial board. If there is a suspicion, or an awareness of any misconduct with the publication process, refer this immediately to the JIM editors editors@open-jim.org. JIM also recommends referring to COPE's step-by-stop process flowcharts on handling different aspects of publication ethics issues.